We had this discussion the other day in class and I'd like to try and get some feedback on it. There are two questions that come up often in art. What is art? and What is good art? Often we use the second question after we've answered the first in the affirmative. But what does it mean for something to be good art? We can either say that good/bad art is a subjective issue, in which case the conversation ends.
But if we attempt to identify good art on an objective basis we see that any attribute that could be applied to an objective definition of art in general. Which leads us to another question, should we even discuss what makes up the qualities of good art?
Sunday, May 2, 2010
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
